<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psychic James Van Praagh Shows Off His &#8220;Powers&#8221; On The Dr. Phil Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil</link>
	<description>A skeptic blog that shows you why not to believe everything you&#039;re told.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-530</guid>
		<description>I like your style of writting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your style of writting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Overman</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>David Overman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-497</guid>
		<description>found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-479</guid>
		<description>Dennis:  &quot;GHost Hunters&quot; may or may not be faked--I wouldn&#039;t know for sure if it is or isn&#039;t. But even if it&#039;s not deliberately faked, that doesn&#039;t prove that ghost hunters are more valid than psychics.  I suspect there are many psychics out there who genuinely believe in their psychic abilities, and are not faking anything, at least deliberately. Either way,  I would still approach &quot;Ghost Hunters&quot;  with a healthy skepticism...

I disagree that believing without being obligated to explain why is &quot;Freedom to believe.&quot;  I would say that &quot;Freedom to believe&quot; is not being imprisoned or persecuted for your beliefs.  I have the right to question a person&#039;s beliefs, just as that person has the right to say, &quot;I don&#039;t need to explain myself to you--I&#039;m happy believing.&quot;  Still, I have the right to start the conversation. 

I don&#039;t really have any qualms about people having their own personal beliefs.  The problem is, though, that often these beliefs seep into public society.  I simply don&#039;t have the time or the energy to explain all the issues I have with irrational belief--I&#039;ll simply say that I have an issue when people make decisions based on their religious belief, and not based on critical thinking or logic.  Of course, they can make their personal decisions however they like, but when they make decisions that affect me and/ or my country (i.e. banning gay marriage, abortion, which president to vote for, etc.) based on irrational, unproven belief, I have the right to ask for some evidence.  And if beliefs cannot be solidified, as you say, than they should NOT be used to make decisions that impact society. 
 
  And as far as this specific article goes, psychics like James Vab Praagh make a living exploiting the unsubstantiated beliefs of the people who use their services.  Because these psychics claim to provide a service, and often request money for that service, I (and their customers) have every right to ask that they prove their abilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis:  &#8220;GHost Hunters&#8221; may or may not be faked&#8211;I wouldn&#8217;t know for sure if it is or isn&#8217;t. But even if it&#8217;s not deliberately faked, that doesn&#8217;t prove that ghost hunters are more valid than psychics.  I suspect there are many psychics out there who genuinely believe in their psychic abilities, and are not faking anything, at least deliberately. Either way,  I would still approach &#8220;Ghost Hunters&#8221;  with a healthy skepticism&#8230;</p>
<p>I disagree that believing without being obligated to explain why is &#8220;Freedom to believe.&#8221;  I would say that &#8220;Freedom to believe&#8221; is not being imprisoned or persecuted for your beliefs.  I have the right to question a person&#8217;s beliefs, just as that person has the right to say, &#8220;I don&#8217;t need to explain myself to you&#8211;I&#8217;m happy believing.&#8221;  Still, I have the right to start the conversation. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have any qualms about people having their own personal beliefs.  The problem is, though, that often these beliefs seep into public society.  I simply don&#8217;t have the time or the energy to explain all the issues I have with irrational belief&#8211;I&#8217;ll simply say that I have an issue when people make decisions based on their religious belief, and not based on critical thinking or logic.  Of course, they can make their personal decisions however they like, but when they make decisions that affect me and/ or my country (i.e. banning gay marriage, abortion, which president to vote for, etc.) based on irrational, unproven belief, I have the right to ask for some evidence.  And if beliefs cannot be solidified, as you say, than they should NOT be used to make decisions that impact society. </p>
<p>  And as far as this specific article goes, psychics like James Vab Praagh make a living exploiting the unsubstantiated beliefs of the people who use their services.  Because these psychics claim to provide a service, and often request money for that service, I (and their customers) have every right to ask that they prove their abilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DENNIS TEEL</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>DENNIS TEEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-478</guid>
		<description>i may not have the same beliefs as another(religious,ufo&#039;s,etc but .freedom to believe without being obligated to explain why  one believes is called freedom to believe. /i don&#039;t question one&#039;s beliefs regarding proof.thats why it&#039;s called a &#039;belief&#039;.i don&#039;t have any qualms about it.they believe what they do,so what?? as long as they&#039;re not  stealing my wife or raping my cattle ,i&#039;m happy/.

to even question validity of a belief is an oxy moron action..one can&#039;t prove  solidly ,a belief.
there&#039;s&quot; i believe&quot;   and &quot;i know&quot;
you can&#039;t request proof for the &quot;i believe.&quot;

it&#039;s like demanding proof  that a theory is fact/.



it&#039;s like demanding to  know if brittany spears is wearing underwear..

well..not the last one./</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i may not have the same beliefs as another(religious,ufo&#8217;s,etc but .freedom to believe without being obligated to explain why  one believes is called freedom to believe. /i don&#8217;t question one&#8217;s beliefs regarding proof.thats why it&#8217;s called a &#8216;belief&#8217;.i don&#8217;t have any qualms about it.they believe what they do,so what?? as long as they&#8217;re not  stealing my wife or raping my cattle ,i&#8217;m happy/.</p>
<p>to even question validity of a belief is an oxy moron action..one can&#8217;t prove  solidly ,a belief.<br />
there&#8217;s&#8221; i believe&#8221;   and &#8220;i know&#8221;<br />
you can&#8217;t request proof for the &#8220;i believe.&#8221;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s like demanding proof  that a theory is fact/.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s like demanding to  know if brittany spears is wearing underwear..</p>
<p>well..not the last one./</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DENNIS TEEL</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>DENNIS TEEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-477</guid>
		<description>while i don&#039;t have any kind of faith  in psychics ,i happen to know the the program &quot;ghost hunters&quot; isn&#039;t faked so  i&#039;d rely more on a ghost hunter to tell me about  something dead than a psychic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while i don&#8217;t have any kind of faith  in psychics ,i happen to know the the program &#8220;ghost hunters&#8221; isn&#8217;t faked so  i&#8217;d rely more on a ghost hunter to tell me about  something dead than a psychic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but there&#039;s no tooth fairy, no Santa Claus and nobody communicates with the dead.  When Van Praagh was doing the reading of the audience members, he was using a technique called &quot;Cold Reading&quot;. Go to http://www.drphil.com/shows/show/1094   and read the transcript. &quot;There’s a guy here who died on a motorcycle,” he says. A curly-haired woman stands. “My friend died on a motorcycle,” she says.  This seems miraculous, but let&#039;s think about it. Dr. Phil&#039;s audience appears to contain a few hundred people. The chance is very large that someone in that audience will know someone  who died on a motorcycle.  Remember, it did not necessarily have to be the woman who stood up. He gets credit for a hit if anyone stands up. 
Van Praagh asks if he was in a band? She doesn&#039;t answer this question, so not a hit. 
Are you in a band? She says that her friend is. Apparently she&#039;s not and the dead motorcycle guy was not, so no credit for this one.
&quot;There&#039;s a Michael also&quot;, he says. She answers that Michaels was his last name.   By saying &quot;there&#039;s a Michael also&quot;, he is implying that this is a different person, not the motorcycle guy, but she connects it for him, so it appears to be a hit. If you walk up to 100 people and ask if they know anyone named Michael, I&#039;d bet that 99 would. How can VanPraagh lose?.

\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but there&#8217;s no tooth fairy, no Santa Claus and nobody communicates with the dead.  When Van Praagh was doing the reading of the audience members, he was using a technique called &#8220;Cold Reading&#8221;. Go to <a href="http://www.drphil.com/shows/show/1094" rel="nofollow">http://www.drphil.com/shows/show/1094</a>   and read the transcript. &#8220;There’s a guy here who died on a motorcycle,” he says. A curly-haired woman stands. “My friend died on a motorcycle,” she says.  This seems miraculous, but let&#8217;s think about it. Dr. Phil&#8217;s audience appears to contain a few hundred people. The chance is very large that someone in that audience will know someone  who died on a motorcycle.  Remember, it did not necessarily have to be the woman who stood up. He gets credit for a hit if anyone stands up.<br />
Van Praagh asks if he was in a band? She doesn&#8217;t answer this question, so not a hit.<br />
Are you in a band? She says that her friend is. Apparently she&#8217;s not and the dead motorcycle guy was not, so no credit for this one.<br />
&#8220;There&#8217;s a Michael also&#8221;, he says. She answers that Michaels was his last name.   By saying &#8220;there&#8217;s a Michael also&#8221;, he is implying that this is a different person, not the motorcycle guy, but she connects it for him, so it appears to be a hit. If you walk up to 100 people and ask if they know anyone named Michael, I&#8217;d bet that 99 would. How can VanPraagh lose?.</p>
<p>\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 21:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-247</guid>
		<description>It seems like most of you here agree with us!  I&#039;d love to ask Dr. Phil what his thought process was in having Van Praagh on the show.  Could he possibly have a reason besides ratings? I don&#039;t think for one second that Dr. Phil takes these psychics seriously...and I&#039;m disappointed that he didn&#039;t take more of a stand.  I think I&#039;d have minded less if he actually DID believe in psychics.  The fact that he doesn&#039;t just made this episode even more sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like most of you here agree with us!  I&#8217;d love to ask Dr. Phil what his thought process was in having Van Praagh on the show.  Could he possibly have a reason besides ratings? I don&#8217;t think for one second that Dr. Phil takes these psychics seriously&#8230;and I&#8217;m disappointed that he didn&#8217;t take more of a stand.  I think I&#8217;d have minded less if he actually DID believe in psychics.  The fact that he doesn&#8217;t just made this episode even more sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Good post.  There seem to be an infinite of Dr Phil-style presenters who will happily advertise self-proclaimed psychics.   

It&#039;s really amazing how many psychic bullshitters get to be on TV.  Whole nights pass when half the UK cable channels show nothing but dross like &quot;Most Haunted&quot; and &quot;Psychic detectives.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  There seem to be an infinite of Dr Phil-style presenters who will happily advertise self-proclaimed psychics.   </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really amazing how many psychic bullshitters get to be on TV.  Whole nights pass when half the UK cable channels show nothing but dross like &#8220;Most Haunted&#8221; and &#8220;Psychic detectives.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-245</guid>
		<description>This uncritical pandering to psychics by television continues to be unfortunate, although there have been a few decent critical news commentaries in recent years. But, as you pointed out, this all seems to be nothing more than a promotional commercial for Van Praagh - sell out indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This uncritical pandering to psychics by television continues to be unfortunate, although there have been a few decent critical news commentaries in recent years. But, as you pointed out, this all seems to be nothing more than a promotional commercial for Van Praagh &#8211; sell out indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Dr. Phil Sell Out With Psychic Show? &#171; Cool Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/james-van-praagh-dr-phil/comment-page-1#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Dr. Phil Sell Out With Psychic Show? &#171; Cool Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=69#comment-244</guid>
		<description>[...] Skeptical Monkey wonders if Dr. Phil let the psychics and psychic-believers on a recent episode too easy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Skeptical Monkey wonders if Dr. Phil let the psychics and psychic-believers on a recent episode too easy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
