<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Skeptical Monkey &#187; research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/tag/research/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com</link>
	<description>A skeptic blog that shows you why not to believe everything you&#039;re told.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists are Biased.  Just Not in the Way You Think.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/scientists-are-biased-just-not-in-the-way-you-think</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/scientists-are-biased-just-not-in-the-way-you-think#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists can be wrong. For years, many have hypothesized that the first animals evolved in the sea. Now, new scientific findings may suggest otherwise. According to this article: …researchers studying ancient rock samples in South China have found that the &#8230; <p class="more"><a href="http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/scientists-are-biased-just-not-in-the-way-you-think" rel="bookmark" title="Read on...">Read More</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/scientists-are-biased-just-not-in-the-way-you-think/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oxford’s God Study: No Psychologists?</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/oxfords-god-study-no-psychologists</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/oxfords-god-study-no-psychologists#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyschology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shermer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/why-do-people-believe/oxfords-god-study-no-psychologists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 19, 2008, several online news sites ran an article by the Associated Press titled Oxford to Study Faith in God (I&#8217;ll link to this one, if you&#8217;d like to read the short article in full). The first paragraph &#8230; <p class="more"><a href="http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/oxfords-god-study-no-psychologists" rel="bookmark" title="Read on...">Read More</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/oxfords-god-study-no-psychologists/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia Entries: The More Authors the Better</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/wikipedia-entries-the-more-authors-the-better</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/wikipedia-entries-the-more-authors-the-better#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Monkey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misconceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizendium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veropedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/quality-of-web/wikipedia-entries-the-more-authors-the-better/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quality of content on Wikipedia.org may seem like an obvious and easy target for Skeptical Monkey. Wikipedia does not have guidelines for its contributors, inviting anyone with a computer and Internet connection to submit their own content to the &#8230; <p class="more"><a href="http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/wikipedia-entries-the-more-authors-the-better" rel="bookmark" title="Read on...">Read More</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticalmonkey.com/wikipedia-entries-the-more-authors-the-better/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
