Psychic James Van Praagh Shows Off His “Powers” On The Dr. Phil Show

Published in: Why Do People Believe? by Sara | Discuss

Montel Williams may be going off the air, but it appears there’s no shortage of talk show hosts willing to sell themselves out for a ratings boost. Just look at the Thursday, May 15th episode of Dr. Phil, on which self-proclaimed psychic James Van Praagh came by to promote “Ghost Whisperer” and shill his new book, Ghosts Among Us: Uncovering the Truth About the Other Side.

James Van Praagh on Dr. PhilDr. Phil usually comes across as quite reasonable and logical, and has even advised against using psychics on previous shows. At the start of this particular episode, he claimed to be a skeptic in matters of the paranormal. And Dr. Phil did indeed question some of Van Praagh’s assertions-but this was done rather light-heartedly, while still promoting Van Praagh’s book.

During one segment, Van Praagh walked through Paraount Studios, supposedly on a ghost hunt. Dr. Phil’s website insists that the results of this walk “will surprise you!” Van Praagh points out a building and says, “Lucille Ball was here. That was her office.” He then talks to a Paramount employee who informs him the building housed Lucille Ball’s dressing room. When asked if anything strange happens there, the employee says, “Doors have a tendency to open and close.”

So Van Praagh was able to (almost) identify Lucille Ball’s dressing room? That shouldn’t be surprising to anyone-especially when you take into account that James Van Praagh USED TO WORK IN THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF PARAMOUNT STUDIOS. Are we really supposed to believe that he sensed Lucille Ball’s spirit, when the more likely possibility is that he simply used some information that he aquired as a Paramount employee?

James Van Praagh on Dr. PhilAnyone who has ever watched the Dr. Phil show knows that he is not one to mince words; when he thinks one of his guests is full of it, he promptly tells them so. He appeared to be dancing around the issue with Van Praagh, however. When one woman claimed that she is constantly haunted by a violent spirit named “Jerry,” Dr. Phil only half-heartedly suggested the real problem may be a mental disorder, and allowed Van Praagh’s reading with the guest to dominate the segment.

James Van Praagh on Dr. PhilAnother woman said she was “addicted to psychics,” sometimes seeking their guidance through psychic hotlines three to four times a day. Dr. Phil pointed out that anyone could be on the other end of those hotlines because “there is no screening ,” and firmly told the woman she was “getting scammed.” All the while, of course, he was sharing the stage with an even worse con artist. What screenings has Van Praagh had to go through? What qualifications does he have that make him more legitimate than hotline psychics? Dr. Phil then followed this segment by allowing Van Praagh to perform readings for audience members, never saying a word about the less-than-impressive results. Is it any wonder that some people become dependent on psychics, when so many popular TV personalities (Montel Williams, Larry King, etc.) appear to endorse these frauds?

If this is Dr. Phil being “skeptical,” I’d hate to see him when he’s selling himself out.

5 Responses to Psychic James Van Praagh Shows Off His “Powers” On The Dr. Phil Show

  1. [...] Skeptical Monkey wonders if Dr. Phil let the psychics and psychic-believers on a recent episode too easy: [...]

  2. This uncritical pandering to psychics by television continues to be unfortunate, although there have been a few decent critical news commentaries in recent years. But, as you pointed out, this all seems to be nothing more than a promotional commercial for Van Praagh - sell out indeed.

  3. Good post. There seem to be an infinite of Dr Phil-style presenters who will happily advertise self-proclaimed psychics.

    It’s really amazing how many psychic bullshitters get to be on TV. Whole nights pass when half the UK cable channels show nothing but dross like “Most Haunted” and “Psychic detectives.”

  4. It seems like most of you here agree with us! I’d love to ask Dr. Phil what his thought process was in having Van Praagh on the show. Could he possibly have a reason besides ratings? I don’t think for one second that Dr. Phil takes these psychics seriously…and I’m disappointed that he didn’t take more of a stand. I think I’d have minded less if he actually DID believe in psychics. The fact that he doesn’t just made this episode even more sad.

  5. Sorry, but there’s no tooth fairy, no Santa Claus and nobody communicates with the dead. When Van Praagh was doing the reading of the audience members, he was using a technique called “Cold Reading”. Go to http://www.drphil.com/shows/show/1094 and read the transcript. “There’s a guy here who died on a motorcycle,” he says. A curly-haired woman stands. “My friend died on a motorcycle,” she says. This seems miraculous, but let’s think about it. Dr. Phil’s audience appears to contain a few hundred people. The chance is very large that someone in that audience will know someone who died on a motorcycle. Remember, it did not necessarily have to be the woman who stood up. He gets credit for a hit if anyone stands up.
    Van Praagh asks if he was in a band? She doesn’t answer this question, so not a hit.
    Are you in a band? She says that her friend is. Apparently she’s not and the dead motorcycle guy was not, so no credit for this one.
    “There’s a Michael also”, he says. She answers that Michaels was his last name. By saying “there’s a Michael also”, he is implying that this is a different person, not the motorcycle guy, but she connects it for him, so it appears to be a hit. If you walk up to 100 people and ask if they know anyone named Michael, I’d bet that 99 would. How can VanPraagh lose?.

    \

Reply To This Article

You can use these tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>